PATENTS ON THE CHEAP

Many new inventors begin the patent journey with the belief that protecting an invention should be quick, affordable and uncomplicated. Searches online will confirm that you are permitted to file a patent application without employing a patent attorney. In the UK, any inventor may submit their own patent application directly to the Intellectual Property Office and the system is intentionally designed to be accessible. However, while filing independently is perfectly legal, the question is not whether you can do it but whether you should.

​

SELF FILING IS LEGAL BUT HIGH RISK

A patent specification is a serious legal document and the responsibility for getting it right sits entirely with the applicant. A poorly drafted application can severely weaken or even destroy the value of a patent before it ever reaches grant. The first filing of a patent must contain everything required to define and support the invention. If essential information, variations or additional embodiments are missing, they cannot simply be added later. This means that defects in the initial submission can become permanent limitations. Many inventors who attempt to draft their own specifications find that their claims end up too narrow, too vague or too easily worked around by competitors. Patent attorneys spend years learning how to interpret inventions and translate them into broad, defensible legal claims. Without this expertise, the risk of unintentionally filing something weak or unenforceable is extremely high.

​

THE REAL TEST IS COMMERCIAL READINESS

If the primary motivation for self filing is cost, it raises a much larger concern. A patent does not develop a product, design packaging, manufacture stock, raise investment or put a product into retailers. These activities can cost many times more than the patent itself. If a project cannot yet afford professional patent services, it may be premature to invest in patent protection at all. Commercial readiness requires validated demand, prototypes, costings, manufacturing strategy, branding, market positioning and a plan for sales. Filing a patent too early, without the commercial structure to support it, can drain limited resources while delivering little practical value. Many successful inventors and businesses first invest in design development, market validation and commercial planning before committing to a professionally drafted patent.

​

CHEAP PATENTS OFTEN LEAD TO EXPENSIVE PROBLEMS

The most common outcome of self drafted patents is not success but regret. Once an invention is disclosed or published, the novelty requirement prevents a second filing that covers what was missed the first time. Weak initial filings often leave gaps that competitors can exploit. In litigation, self drafted patents fail far more frequently because the claims, language and definitions lack the precision required to withstand legal attack. A patent attorney will not step in to defend the rights for free and the Patent Office does not enforce your rights for you. If infringement occurs, it is up to the patent owner to pursue legal action at their own cost. Litigation is extremely expensive and a poorly written patent is far more likely to collapse under scrutiny. Therefore, saving money on the application often leads to far greater financial loss in the future.

​

A PATENT IS A COMMERCIAL WEAPON NOT A CERTIFICATE

A strong patent does far more than sit in a drawer. It provides negotiating leverage, intimidates competitors, strengthens investment proposals, increases valuation and secures stronger licensing and royalty agreements. A weak patent does none of these things. A patent specification must be written as a strategic commercial instrument. The wording, structure and claims determine whether a competitor can design around it or must choose to license from you instead. Businesses and investors understand this. This is why patents drafted by experienced attorneys are treated as real assets, while cheaply compiled filings are often viewed with caution.

​

WHY PROFESSIONAL DRAFTING MATTERS

An experienced patent attorney is not simply a legal scribe. They interpret the invention from multiple angles, identify variants and embodiments the inventor may not have considered, anticipate potential attack routes and craft a specification that is defensible. Good attorneys draft for the worst day in your commercial journey – the day your patent is challenged by someone with resources, legal support and something significant to gain by invalidating your rights. A well drafted patent discourages infringement before it has even begun because competitors recognise the strength and risk of challenging it.

​

WHEN SELF FILING MAY BE APPROPRIATE

There are a small number of situations where independently filing may make sense. An inventor with deep legal and technical drafting experience may be capable of producing strong documents. A low cost early filing may occasionally serve as a stopgap while commercial data is gathered. However, these are exceptions rather than the rule. For most inventors, the downside of getting the filing wrong far outweighs any short term saving.

​

CONCLUSION

Cutting corners during the patent process is rarely a saving. It can permanently damage an invention’s commercial potential and make enforcement extremely difficult or impossible. A patent is not an administrative form but a strategic business weapon. If affordability is the only reason for avoiding a professional attorney, it may indicate that the project needs further development before filing. When done correctly, a patent becomes a valuable asset capable of deterring competitors, securing investment and supporting commercial growth. When done cheaply, it often provides nothing more than a false sense of security.

​

This is why the strongest commercial inventions treat the patent not as a cost to avoid but as a business investment worth doing properly from the start.

​